It is well-known that The Beatles were a quartet also known as the "Fab Four." But debate
has
been raging for decades about the fifth Beatle — an unheralded, unnamed person who was somehow instrumental
to
the band's staggering success. Who deserves the title? Dozens of hangers-on and associates have staked out
the
name, but there are six men who are most often mentioned in fifth Beatle conversations: two who were members
of
the band in its early days as a quintet and four who were longtime behind-the-scenes collaborators.
Stuart Sutcliffe perhaps has the most claim to the title — he was the fifth member of the
band
from 1960 to 1961, and he wasn't replaced after he left. A friend of John Lennon's from the Liverpool
College of
Art, he was more artistically than musically inclined, but he became the Beatles' original bassist and
played
clubs with them in Hamburg, Germany.
His "mop-top" hairdo, sunglasses and skinny pants influenced what would become the Beatles' signature style.
When the rest of the group went back home to Liverpool in 1961 (and subsequently made it big), he stayed in
Hamburg, and Paul McCartney took over as bassist. Sutcliffe died of a brain aneurysm only a few months later
at
the age of 21.
Pete Best was the Beatles' original drummer, a member of the band along with Sutcliffe. He returned to
Liverpool
with the group in 1961 but was fired a year later and replaced by Ringo Starr. The official story is that
the
band's first studio producers wanted to ditch Best for a more experienced drummer, but rumors suggest he was
let
go for getting more than his fair share of attention from female fans. By all accounts, the firing was not
handled well, and he successfully sued the Beatles in 1968 for libel because of a Playboy article in which
Starr
claimed he abused drugs.
By all accounts, the firing was not handled well, and he successfully sued the Beatles in 1968 for libel because of a Playboy article in which Starr claimed he abused drugs.
By all accounts, the firing was not handled well, and he successfully sued the Beatles in 1968 for libel because of a Playboy article in which Starr claimed he abused drugs.
PROMOWANE TREŚCI
